Nikon 200-400 f4 testing

Started Jun 17, 2013 | Discussions thread
RBFresno Forum Pro • Posts: 12,565
Re: Nikon 200-400 f4 testing

Wanchese wrote:

Your tests prove one big flaw with the 200-400 for field sports. Too much DOF. I've had the lens for years. It kicks booty for motorsports. But when shooting across field to a player near the opposite sideline, everything and everyone on the sidelines is in focus....and that's at f4. Good luck at f7.1 and beyond.

-- hide signature --

You Will Never Walk Alone


It's one of the reasons you still see Photographers on the sidelines using the heavier 400VR (f/2.8) as well as the 600VR lenses despite the higher ISO capabilities of the newer DSLR's.

Also one of the reasons I try to get close enough to some subjects with the 200VR:

Nikon D3 ,Nikkor 200mm f/2G IF-ED AF-S VR
1/2500s f/2.5 at 200.0mm iso400

Nikon D3 ,Nikkor 200mm f/2G IF-ED AF-S VR
1/2000s f/2.2 at 200.0mm iso250

The ability to isolate can sometimes come in handy. wish i had one of these (300 f/2):

Nikon D700 + Nikkor 300mm f/2 — 800 sec, f/2, ISO 6400

Nikon D700 + Nikkor 300mm f/2 — 320 sec, f/2, ISO 6400



 RBFresno's gear list:RBFresno's gear list
Nikon D2H Nikon D4 Nikon AF DX Fisheye-Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR +14 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow