Advantages of Foveon sensor Locked

Started Jun 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
xpatUSA Forum Pro • Posts: 12,136
Re: There is at least one absolute, and you refuse it.

Kendall Helmstetter Gelner wrote:

Bobn2 wrote:


That's potentially the case, but in actuality Foveon sensors lose more photons than do Bayer.

In actuality they lose almost none, can you truly disagree that most of the photons hitting the sensor end up in the sensor at one depth or another?. It's the processing that matters.

We seem to be forgetting Quantum Efficiency (QE) in this thread. QE is the measure of how many photons get converted to electrons and are thereby detected in the sensitive parts (diffusion zones) of the sensor. Most of the photons are not detected and many pass all the way through the silicon and exit unimpeded from the back of the slab.

Early Foveon F7 sensors had quite a low QE - thirty something per cent max (which Foveon hid by taking the spectral average of each layer and adding them together - shades of 10MP versus 3.4MP).

The low QE was exacerbated by the broad spectral response of each layer which causes quite a bit of subtraction during interpolation. Small wonder that the SD9 was limited to ISO 400. For this very reason, Foveon's first step downward was taken in the F7-C9110 sensor by increasing the fill factor through the use of a micro-lens layer added to the sensor face.

By comparison, Bayer sensors - with their more separated and peaky CFA spectral responses - generally have higher QEs than later Foveons (is my guess). Does anyone have comparative figures for Merrills vs. Bayers?

-- hide signature --

SD9, SD10, EF-500, GH1.

 xpatUSA's gear list:xpatUSA's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Sigma SD14 Sigma SD15 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +13 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow