Lenses: Did they get it right??

Started Jun 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
Adrian Tung
Adrian Tung Veteran Member • Posts: 3,616
Re: Fuji for portraits?

deednets wrote:

But they didn't instead there is now a 12, 32 and then the next one a 50/2.8 Macro ... *sigh* You are saying that NOW they are about to the real deal portrait lens. Now as in 2014, right?

I think what Zeiss released makes sense if you think from the perspective of Zeiss making for the NEX platform, and Fuji is just an opportunistic release.

The NEX doesn't have a ultra-wide prime yet, and their 10-18 isn't spectacular on the NEX7 so this is where the 14mm comes in.

The 32mm is an oddity, since it competes directly with 35mm, but considering that it is almost practically a simple double gauss based on the Planar design, it makes sense to output a "normal", simple design.

And the 50... well, kill two birds with one stone. NEX platform is sorely lacking a good, native E-mount macro (the 30/3.5 isn't stellar and quite short length for serious macro), so a 50mm fills the gap nicely *plus* macro lenses can very often double as portrait lenses as well. So see this kind of focal length duplication for macro/portrait across all platforms, on Canon EF there's 85mm and 100mm (portrait) vs 100mm (macro), on Nikon there's 85mm (portrait) and 105mm (macro), on m43 there's 45/2.8 (macro) and 45/1.8 (portrait), and so on.

 Adrian Tung's gear list:Adrian Tung's gear list
Sony RX100 III Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 Sony RX100 VI Olympus PEN-F Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow