DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon 17-55 f/2.8 or Canon 24-70 L f/2.8 to replace Tamron 17-50 f/2.8

Started Jun 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
buckeyevet
OP buckeyevet Regular Member • Posts: 103
Re: Canon 17-55 f/2.8 or Canon 24-70 L f/2.8 to replace Tamron 17-50 f/2.8

Damoo wrote:

Once you buy the sigma 17-50mm f2.8 or the canon 17-55mm f2.8, you might feel that the Tamron u had offered more for its price. Thats natural.

In terms of optical quality, Canon's 17-55mm f2.8 is the best. Excellent corner sharpness & IMHO the best general purpose lens for walkaround on an APS-C. But it is expensive. The sigma 17-50mm f2.8 is the next best choice but I it lacks FTM which could be a useful feature.

While I own the 15-85mm, I must say that I am not very pleased with the 'optical quality' of the lens. Many people in this forum say great things about it. But I am not sure how many of them are really honest. For e.g. the 4 stops IS - I felt it good with 3 stops & not sure if one gets 4 stops of IS. With extreme distortions & CA, it does feel a big expensive. At the same time, the lens is very sharo from 70-85mm focal lengths & also the 15mm is quite wide. The AF is fast & build quality is good.

Hence would rate 17-55mm f2.8 Canon-> 17-50mm f2.8 Sigma -> 15-85mm Canon.

Great info.  Thanks for the comparison!

-- hide signature --

Jennifer

 buckeyevet's gear list:buckeyevet's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
GKN
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow