One year with the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

Started Jun 9, 2013 | User reviews thread
Flat view
frontal_lobe Contributing Member • Posts: 519
One year with the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

I thought I'd write a short user's review of the Nikon 24-140 f/4 G VR lens now that I've had it for about a year. I've used it mainly with my D700, and to a lesser extent with my D300.
Bottom line: it is a terrific lens and I'm delighted with it.
I bought this because I wanted a general purpose FX zoom. For my purposes the focal length range, constant f/4 aperture and VR were just right. But before buying it, I hummed and hawed about the lukewarm to outright negative comments I saw online about it, as well as the price, which was more than I really wanted to pay. But then again, it pays to remember this is a 5x zoom, and you pay in both money and ultimate image quality for practicality. In the end, I gave in and bought one in May last year (from Wex here in the UK, who were cheapest at the time).
I've used it mostly as my go-to lens for day-to-day work. It has been with me walking round cities, for landscape and aviation photography. I've done a fair amount of people photography as well.
I'm posting a few samples below with comments.
The focal length range is great for photographing events. Here's a couple from each end of the range taken when the Olympic Torch came through Canterbury last summer.

The Olympic Torch passes though Canterbury. 24 mm.

Crowds who came to see the Olympic Torch. 120 mm.

It works well with grad or ND filters. The next one is with a Lee ND grad and the one after that has both a ND and a Big Stopper.

Supermarine Spitfire TA805 Mk9 (the Kent Spitfire)

Seasalter beach

VR works great. Here are a couple taken air-to-air with slowish shutter speeds to get full prop circles. The thing about these is that they were taken in aircraft that vibrate significantly, and the VR just helps with sharpness.

Yak-50 "Sasha" And T6

Bulldog G-CBJJ

Some of the criticisms I read focussed on the overall sharpness and general image quality. I've no criticisms here at all. I don't print larger than 18" x 12" usually, and all those I've made at that size are simply pin sharp irrespective of aperture or focal length. (The Spitfire picture above looks great at 18" x 12"!) Similarly a print of the next one is bitingly sharp and detailed.

Fat Tuesday's instruments

I've used it much less on the D300, both because of size and weight (see below), but also because I don't find the focal length range so comfortable on DX (your mileage will certainly vary on this point). It works very well on the D300, but needed significant fine focus adjustment (-10), which was not needed on the D700.

Just for my own interest, when I thought of writing this review, I thought I would try a few pictures to compare the nature of the images at f/4 (wide open) with two of my favourite primes at the same aperture: the venerable 105 mm f/2 DC and 50 mm f/1.4 G. This morning, I took them into my garden, and used a tree trunk as my "model". Using a tripod and exposure delay/remote release, I took some pictures as simple comparators for sharpness just off centre (about where you might put your subject's eyes in a portrait), and quality of the out of focus background.

Comparison of the 24-120 with 105DC and 50mm primes: best to look at the original via link below
Original, larger version here
I was pleased just how good the zoom is: certainly sharp enough for my purposes. Both the primes are sharper at f/4 than the zoom, as expected. Also, note that the zoom is sharper than the 105DC when +4R DC is applied: perhaps that's another reason why the 105DC is a flattering portrait lens? The bokeh of the 105DC is, as I'd hoped, much better, especially with the +4DC, but I'd have no qualms at all about using the zoom for a portrait if I'd not got either of the primes with me.
What don't I like about it? Size and price. The price, here in the UK is still expensive, and you'll want to think long and hard about whether the 24-85mm would suit you equally well at lower cost. After a year with this lens, I would not change my mind. I'll take the constant f/4 and wider focal length range, even with the greater cost.
But size. This is a big lens. I've always been one for small cameras, and having "grown up" in photographic terms with an OM2n, I'm still amazed (and slightly horrified!) that I've ended up with something as big and heavy as the D700/24-120 combination.

On the way to Earls Court for the Olympic Volleyball: flare is well controlled.

Poland fans at the Olympic volleyball

I spent some time during the Olympics walking round London with the D700/24-120 (and the 50mm in the bag as well) and I took it on a visit to the US at the end of last year. Although in technical terms it is perfect for me as a walk-around combination, in the end it is just too heavy and big for a whole day walking in a city. I've gone back to the D300 and 18-70 for the moment as my walk around stand by, and I think sometime in the future I'll go for a small mirrorless camera.

If you can cope with the size and weight, the lens is great for tourism

Manhattan from Rossevelt Island, pano of 24 stitched images

But nevertheless, I think this is a terrific lens, and even if I do supplement my gear with a small mirrorless camera, I can't imagine ever replacing this lens with something else in my DSLR kit. You'll still find it in my cold dead hands.

 frontal_lobe's gear list:frontal_lobe's gear list
Nikon D700 Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikon AF Nikkor 35mm f/2D Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D +3 more
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
Zoom lens • Nikon F (FX) • 2193
Announced: Aug 19, 2010
frontal_lobe's score
Average community score
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Nikon D300 Nikon D700
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow