KONIKA 40 1.8 vs CANON 50 1.4

Started Apr 22, 2013 | Questions thread
verybiglebowski Veteran Member • Posts: 3,897
Re: KONIKA 40 1.8 vs CANON 50 1.4

bzx wrote:

verybiglebowski wrote:

None of them have a bokeh to cry for.

I have the Canon and while crying for bokeh is subjective, I must say that the one of Canon is pleasurable I saw your very nice extensive test of the 50mm manuals, and I can't really say if the winner lens does have the one to cry for - again this is subjective... Care to make some new test?

PS. oh crap, an old thread again

-- hide signature --


I don't know if you have seen few 50mm shots in my gallery -

http://verybiglobo.blogspot.com/50mm at f1.8, and there are some bokeh test of 35mm lenses on my blog: 35mm bokeh comparison

Canon FD 50 f1.4 has ugly bokeh, but you should not mix the bokeh with the subject isolation abillity. Of course, you can get some nice smooth background with the lens in propper conditions.

I will make more 50mm tests in the future, there are many waiting for it, but I have to find the time.

 verybiglebowski's gear list:verybiglebowski's gear list
Sony Alpha a7R III Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow