The proof is in the printing ...

Started May 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
Sergey_Green Forum Pro • Posts: 10,172
Don't know what to say really ..

John King wrote:

As I stated before: as ISO (cameras) is defined by the ISO (standards organisation). Here:

Did you read it? It appears not ...

You stated before that you prefer Bill Claff's scientific approach, which, in your words, start with measuring real world examples. To which Bill Claff stated earlier that he does not measure "real" world examples, but collects manufacturer stated ISO instead. Now you are alluding that there is a well defined standard for measuring ISO (appears you know nothing about), which even more contradicts your earlier statement.
Again, Bill Claff specifically states that the native ISO of the sensor is seldom exactly a standard value, and the native ISO information is all he is interested in,
ISO Collaboration
I do not know what to say, did you not know what you write, or did you write it intentionally. If so, then for what gain, why?


 Sergey_Green's gear list:Sergey_Green's gear list
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow