The proof is in the printing ...

Started May 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
OP veroman Veteran Member • Posts: 4,845
Re: Indeed

Sergey_Green wrote:

Most modern printers will show around 6+ stops of DR. Many modern dSLRs capture 14+ stops. When sent to the printer the image is converted according to the printer's specifications, I mean there is no magic in it, and is reproduced accordingly. So what DxO camera tests got to do with printing is truly beyond me. But then again, those who seek the answers do usually find them.

I'm afraid you have misunderstood what I wrote. I was discussing technical data, ie dxomark sensor tests, and reliance on them as a way of judging a camera's IQ. I didn't bring up dxomark in the context of print quality.

All I'm saying is that a camera's IQ based on real-world use vs. the technical data associated with that camera usually don't go hand-in-hand. A Canon G7, for example, sits very low on the dxo rankings and would appear from ANY review to be an outdated, useless camera. Not so. It produces excellent images if used correctly and within its limitations.

By the way, new modern cameras have 14 stops of DR (if that) only at base to lower ISOs. The DR falls off pretty rapidly beyond ISO 400. The "old" Fuji S5 Pro, however, retains a full 13 stops of DR up to ISO 800. However, the Fuji S5 Pro's DR is still no match for modern cameras at ISOs higher than ISO 800. Its DR really falls off a cliff as it approaches ISO 1600.

-- hide signature --

'When love and skill work together, expect a masterpiece.'
— Found in a Chinese Fortune Cookie

 veroman's gear list:veroman's gear list
Leica Digilux 2 Ricoh GR II Olympus E-5 Fujifilm X-E2
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow