DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

EF 70-200mm 1:4L USM with or without IS

Started May 16, 2013 | Questions thread
geronimo789 Regular Member • Posts: 263
Re: EF 70-200mm 1:4L USM with or without IS

I'm in a similar debate after having borrowed a F4L (non-IS). (except that i'm considering a third lens also)

It is a fantastic lens, and the IS version is supposed to be even better. Of course, it's around twice the price too.

Another one I'm also considering is the fairly new Sigma 50-150mm F2.8 OS. Not a lot of info out there, but most of it seems to indicate that is a REALLY good lens. Major downside is that it's APS-C only, and around as heavy/bulky or even more so as the Canon 70-200F2.8L IS2. The price is very reasonable too at around 800 euros (Canon F4 IS costs 1100). Anyways, these guys: http://www.lenstip.com/364.1-Lens_review-Sigma_50-150_mm_f_2.8_APO_EX_DC_OS_HSM_Introduction.html  are rahter enthusiastic about it, claiming it can match sharpness on the canon 100mmL macro. I'm not sure how credible they are though...

The only reason I'm still hesitating is because the 70-200 is a tad too long for my likings on a crop like somebody else said. 70-200 is a superb midrange/portrait zoom range on full frame.

So all in all IS or not comes down to one question; are you willing to dough up a lot more for a slight boost in IQ, weather proofing and IS ? It's definately the better lens, but if you're using it strictly as a tele in good weather most of the benefits are irrelevant. Don't forget: you can always turn off IS but you can't turn it on if you don't have it

 geronimo789's gear list:geronimo789's gear list
Canon EOS 70D Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EOS M +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow