(100 - 400) or (70-200 2.8 + 300 4L+ 1.4x III/ 2x III) for wildlife photography

Started May 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
jaegg New Member • Posts: 4
Re: (100 - 400) or (70-200 2.8 + 300 4L+ 1.4x III/ 2x III) for wildlife photography


I am in a similar decision process - thanks for that interesting threat – and one thought/question more.

Starting with a crop EOS and the 70-300 Non L, today I am shooting full frame (5D, 6D) with a 70-200 4L IS. I am interested in nature and hike a lot (daytrips). So size and weight in general is an issue for me.
With my old combo (Crop camera, 70-300) I did safaris in South Africa and Tansania. Also that a lot of the shoots I’ve done there had been at the long end, I want to stay with a zoom on the 6D.
As I realized on my last trip (Costa Rica) 70-200 4L IS with a Canon 1.4 converter is not a convincible solution on a full frame. Especially in critical contrast light situations the results are insufficient. Furthermore I miss reach, and had to crop the pictures a lot, which reduces quality even more.
In summer, we plan a trip to Namibia and Botswana.
The answer looks obivious – add the 100 – 400 L to the 70-200 4L.
The-digital-picture.com bring up some doubts about that, as they argue the 70-300L as an alternative solution, instead of the 100-400.
That looks pretty attractive for me: only one light lens to carry, modern lens concept with up to date IS.
What´s your opinion ?
Best regards

 jaegg's gear list:jaegg's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Canon Extender EF 1.4x II +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow