14-24 vs 16-35

Started May 5, 2013 | Discussions thread
sd40 Senior Member • Posts: 1,551
Re: 14-24 vs 16-35

vaxn8r wrote:

16-35 pros: It is a very good lens. Maybe not great but I am continually surprised how good it is. It certainly does not deserve the hate it gets around here. I like shooting long exposures so the ability to accept filters is a huge bonus. For indoor museums and churches it is far superior to the 14-24 and even a fast 1.4 prime stopped down, where not only have you lost all DOF but are shooting the prime at it's weakest aperture.

And also for landscape!

The impossibility of interlineating replies in posts here prevented me from adding that I agree that you might want both lenses for different purposes.

 sd40's gear list:sd40's gear list
Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Fisheye-Nikkor 16mm f/2.8D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G +8 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow