OM-D EM-5 definitely has a better IQ than EX-1!

Started May 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Dietr Junior Member • Posts: 47
Re: OM-D EM-5 definitely has a better IQ than EX-1!

deckfrost wrote:

baobob wrote:

Are you sure ?

The main differences you observe are diffrences in settings of the RAW developper

The IQ of the X.1 is really better even is the OLY is already excellent!

-- hide signature --

Good judgment comes from experience
Experience comes from bad judgment

I think most of those who have used both, acknowledge the X-E1 has a better IQ ( and almost defective AF) but for this particular comparison, some test have shown Fuji overstates the ISO quite a bit, it probably fairer to compare the 6,400 Fuji ISO with a 3,200

My X-PRO1 tends to over expose by about 1/3 stop.  So when I am shooting at ISO 3200 it tends to expose more like ISO 4000.  So you in fact have it backwards.  If i turn my compensation down by 1/3 stop, which is what I typically do, I am actually getting better results than the stated ISO.  For example the camera is stating that I am shooting at ISO 3200, but I am in fact shooting at ISO 4000, so my ISO 4000 results should be compared to the OLY at 3200, in which case the FUJI beats the Hell out of the OLY!

 Dietr's gear list:Dietr's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow