How to properly compare RX-100 and NEX-6 kit high ISO noise?

Started Apr 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
CosmoZooo Regular Member • Posts: 452
Re: How to properly compare RX-100 and NEX-6 kit high ISO noise?

The individual photosite size is not so relevant on modern sensors with gapless pixels - it's the total amount of light gathered by the lens that's the most important factor in determining noise levels/DR. I'm no expert but I have been corrected on this in another thread and upon further investigation it seems to be true for modern sensors.

Even though I will admit to not knowing much on the subject of gapless pixels I would cautiously disagree that individual photosite size is not relevant.

I've seen this mentioned in multiples forums that it very much does and even in dpreview articles - the tiny photosites on the smaller sensor is to my understanding the main reason they do not perform the same way as the bigger sensors. It has also been argued that it's the main reason NEX-7 doesn't have the same ISO performance as the NEX-5n/5R/6.

I have also seen others say as they did in the link to the post I provided earlier that a total amount of light is not relevant - that is essentially a crop issues...your field of view is very see less in your frame. Think about it...just like looking through a big pipe/straw/pinhole or a little see less area - but the smaller area is not less you understand my logic here?

So I disagree with that total light hitting the sensor matters - that simply means there is more stuff in your field of is the amount of light per photosite and how well that photosite performs that will decide the overall quality of the sum of all those photosites. Bigger photosites have more light land on them.

If you can explain how more overall light would impact the image quality I would like to hear it.

Here's is what I assert hypothetically:

If you took the RX100 lens at f1.8 and mounted it on the NEX-5R and took a picture you would only see a small crop of the sensor - the resulting image would be black all around except some area in the middle.

Say then you crop that area into a clean rectangle. You then take a 1.8 NEX lens take the same photo and crop out the same exact rectangle from the center of your image.

I assert that assuming both lenses are equally sharp and perform similarly on their respective systems the quality of those rectangles would be nearly identical. I can not think of any reason why that would not be the case.

Think about how legacy FF lenses work on APS-C. They do not produce lower quality images and their speed doesn't change...but you're cropping the image...there is less overall light hitting the sensor but not per photosite - that stays the same assuming the photosite on your FF and APS-C sensors are the same size. You loose bokeh and field of view in the process but not quality - not if the two sensors perform similarly.

Now think about how the speedbooster works - it condenses the light of FF into an APS-C area actually increasing the amount of light hitting each photosite and making the lens faster. The overall amount of light coming through the lens is still the same but it is being concentrated into a smaller area - of course the difficult part here is not to distort the image or introduce another issue so you can only condense things so much...but you see my point here.

I say total light doesn't matter - light per photosite does matter and the performance of each photosite does matter.

I'll let others chime in if they disagree...

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow