Are m4/3 cameras too expensive when you…

Started Apr 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
G1Houston Senior Member • Posts: 2,681
Re: Not really.......

Guy Parsons wrote:

You are missing a "fast" lens to shoot in low light without flash; thus, the 20/1.7 is really critical for a starter kit.  You could get the 17/1.8 but it is more expensive and not sharper.  While the Panasonic 14-45 is slightly better, IMO, it is still a slow kit lens and not worth the trouble of paying more than the kit that comes with E-PL5.

That's what I thought when buying a bunch of stuff with my E-PL5 body. The 20/1.7 wasn't available in time so second choice was the very nice and very cheap Sigma 19/2.8.

20mm + E-PL5 is pocketable, and the combo fits easily in most bags.  This is quite useful for taking photos in the restaurant, zoo/museum (indoor housing for fish and retiles), for example, where light is dim and where carrying a larger camera and using the flash is annoying. The Sigma is a good choice although it is not a pancake.

If the OP will primarily use the camera in broad day light, then of course, a fast lens is not essential.

 G1Houston's gear list:G1Houston's gear list
Nikon D7100 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Sigma 50mm F1.4 EX DG HSM +6 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow