Fuji X20 review posted

Started Apr 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
MOD Danielepaolo Veteran Member • Posts: 4,510
Re: Fuji X20 has inherent too many fine details for some

Trevor G wrote:

ttan98 wrote:

Quirks come from the Cons reviewed by DPreview, I will NOT accepts quirks such as smearing of Jpeg(serious one),


You turn NR back to -2.  That works well for JPEGs.  It's not perfect, but the detail should still be better, far better than the X10, for example.

Noise at low ISO if NR=0(serious),

Noise at ISO100 is awful (I love hyperbole) but I don't mind it when I see all the detail the other cameras miss.

If you are happy with the quirks that's fine too. It's your money after all.

I guess English is your second language, so I am not critcising you when I say that "quirk" is not the correct word for these two things. We would normally use the word "flaw."

Flaw he is most likely reserving for describing your tests, quirks is perfectly acceptable for what he is describing in comparison to your tests. His English is fine.

-- hide signature --

Apologies if my lack of photographic knowledge is catching.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow