Are m4/3 cameras too expensive when you…

Started Apr 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
ryan2007 Forum Pro • Posts: 12,001
Re: Are m4/3 cameras too expensive when you…

You can buy a DSLR like Nikon or Canon. I can speak for Nikon DX stuff.  The Nikon 12-24 & 16-85 (actually now I think its a 10-24) but a really nice lenses and cover from the equivalent 18-35 and 28-130 roughly. Unless you need fast glass and if you want telephoto you can get a 70-300

For micro four thirds you can buy the Panasonic 14-45 & 45-200 to cover the 28-90 and 90-400 equivalent.

You can spend the money and get the fast 2.8 zooms too if you need to. The advantage to buying good glass no matter if its Panasonic, Olympus, Nikon or Canon is all you have to do is upgrade the camera body when needed. You'll always have the good lenses for many years unless you need to make certain switches in gear.

I know that still quality in the Fuji X cameras will give Panasonic & Olympus a run for for the money. The optics I think are even better for stills only.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow