Why Canon need a new sensor with low read out noise

Started Apr 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
zappa1976 Regular Member • Posts: 494
Re: Why Canon need a new sensor with low read out noise

Mikael Risedal wrote:

zappa1976 wrote:

Mikael Risedal wrote:

If you know me I have lent my rawfiles to sceptic people many times here at dpreview when I present my comparisons, dont call me troll please
Why mot react over that 1dx are so clean instead?

Sorry but without the raws available...this is a post by a troll.

I am not sceptic. I know very well the quality of the D800. But i know also how work with the CR2. I think you obtained the worse possible from the 5D3 file.

Don't get me wrong, the D800 is much better than the 5D3 in DR. But your 5D3 results is much worse than you can obtain from the cr2. If posts the cr2 and the nef I can prove it.

But I doubt you will link the raws.;-)

you can how sceptic you want , do you understand DR? from the whitest to be reproduced before clipping  to the shadows/ lowest levels/ black?

Then take a look at this http://www.sensorgen.info/NikonD800.html and this  http://www.sensorgen.info/CanonEOS_5D_MkIII.html

what does this measurements tell you?????

-- hide signature --

Member of Swedish Photographers Association since 1984
Canon, Hasselblad, Leica,Nikon, Linhoff, Sinar
Member of International anti-banding and read out noise Association


why don't you' give us the raws???????

mmmmm...many words and no raws.

And you don't want to be called troll?

P.S.: i already know the sensorgen site.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow