16MP sensor improvements?

Started Apr 24, 2013 | Questions thread
Jorginho Forum Pro • Posts: 14,636
Quite the opposite

In high ISO especially OMD is closer to D7100 than Gh2. In general, again according to DxO, it sits right in between those.

Tha tis downsized at 8 MPIxels. If we compare widgets it is 16 vs 24 MPixel. Here, the D7100 noise will look worse than when we downsize. Also, for the 1000th time, OMD is heavily "penalised""by DxO's take on ISOm which is non standardised.

From my experience fwiw EPL5 (=OMD) does not overstate ISo by nearly as much as DxO claims. I have specifically done tests with the GH2 as comparison. I think it is about 1/3 to 2/3 (at most). It is not consistent but on average I would say 1/2 a stop at most. DxO claims 1  stop. I have never come to that difference. Also: if I go by GH2 and get the 2/3 stop difference it simply is underexposed many times compared to the EPL5...

So to my mind, in conclusion:

1) DxO simply overstates the difference between their real ISO and Oly's

2) The larger pixelcount of the D7100, if we do not resize, will give it larger noise.

In reality I think the difference between these two is smaller than DxO shows us and that with 2) explains why we see so little difference in the widgets.

 Jorginho's gear list:Jorginho's gear list
Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Olympus E-M1 II Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BJL
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow