Is mirrorless the worst of all worlds? and FF the best?

Started Apr 25, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ultimitsu
ultimitsu Veteran Member • Posts: 6,623
Re: Is mirrorless the worst of all worlds? and FF the best?

Beat Traveller wrote:

ultimitsu wrote:

RaymondR wrote:

This cost argument makes no sense to me.  I read it all the time.  I bought my e-Pl2 with the two zoom lens kit for $575 in September 2011.  I have added the 14mm Panny, the 20mm Panny and the Oly 45.

you are the living example supporting his point. one single 24-85 VR does everything all your primes do for less money.

Does that include fitting into a pocket when fully mounted? If so, sign me up.

If your pocket fits 4 primes, then sure.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Biggs23 MOD
(unknown member)
rtf
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow