Lack of VR in Nikon 300mm f4 - big deal or not?

Started Apr 22, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
slimandy Forum Pro • Posts: 16,511
Re: no doubt a Nikon fan club forum

ABA DABA wrote:

Holy Cow, this started out talking about Sigma and Nikon lenses. Then this fellow KrisCT posted some Osprey shots that outshine some other forum posters that brag about using a Nikon 300f4. Another surprising thing is there is only one positive comment about the Osprey shots. And to think the shots were taken with a Tamron 200-500 f5.6-6.3 w//o VR. Give credit where credit is due,  proof of how cliquish and rude you people are. A shamefull display on your part. I'm sure the Nikon 300f4 is a good lens for its use but to ignore the results of other lenses and manufacturer is disgraceful.  OH yes I am a Nikon owner cameras and lenses etc.

-- hide signature --

ABA DABA

Sorry but I thought the thread was about the 300mm f4 and whether it lacked Vr or not. Not sure where I got that impresssion? The title maybe.....?!

-- hide signature --

www.andrewsandersphotography.co.uk

 slimandy's gear list:slimandy's gear list
Sony RX100 II Nikon D200 Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
hwg
hwg
dw1
dw1
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow