sRGB vs. RGB Locked

Started Apr 22, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
OP GMartin Regular Member • Posts: 227
Re: Why use sRGB for JPEGs...

Mike_PEAT wrote:

As  you already stated, websites use sRGB and so do most consumer printers (drugstores, Costco, Walmart, etc.).

Here are some other facts:

- A JPEG image can have a total of 16,777,216 colours consisting of 256 shades of red, 256 shades of green, and 256 shades of blue, and that is true whether you use sRGB or AdobeRGB.

- While AdobeRGB has a larger colour space or "gamut", each of the 256 shades of each colour are spread further apart in the spectrum; the difference between the darkest shade and lightest shade is larger, but there are still only 256 steps between the two extremes of each of the red, green, and blue colours, so the difference between each of those 256 steps is larger/coarser.  To visualize this hold up your hand...your hand represents an image of a sky with many shades of blue.  With your fingers tightly together there is a smooth transition between colours (fingers)...this is an sRGB JPEG image.  Now spread your fingers far apart and note the gaps between them where there are jumps between the shades of blue...this is an AdobeRGB JPEG image.

- With the steps between shades being larger/coarser in AdobeRGB, this can cause blotchiness in especially in skintones and skies, and this could cause someone to think that a lower colour depth or more JPEG compression was used in the image, giving a lower mark as a result.

- Very few people know this, but most common monitors and laptop screens on the market are "TN" based (inexpensive) which only use 6 bits per colour, 64 shades of red, 64 shades of green, and 64 shades of blue for a total of 262,144 colours (they dither to mimic the 16.7 million colours), and of course are optimized for sRGB; this is 90-95% of the consumer/office displays on the market.  Only the more expensive monitors using IPS or PVA technologies are 8bits per colour showing the entire sRGB gamut, and fewer still are "wide gamut" that cover the entire AdobeRGB gamut.  (The reason why most LCD monitors are only 6bits per colour is to speed up response times of displays, the time it takes a pixel to go from light to dark, and reduce the ghosting that occurs with motion in video games and movies due to having process the extra colours...unfortunately with this reduction of viewable colours make these monitors unsuitable for serious photographers.)

- Monitors are measured in NTSC colour (which similar to the Adobe1998 colour space).  Most TN LCD monitors (majority of the monitors on the market) can show only about 40-75% of the NTSC colour gamut (72% of NTSC is roughly equivalent of 100% of the sRGB colour gamut).  An LCD monitor using S-IPS technology (usually costing double or triple the cost of a TN monitor) can show about 80-90%.  Only the most expensive monitors labelled as "wide gamut" approach 100%.  Besides the monitor technology used is the type of backlight that lights up the display...most use fluorescent light which has a limited spectral range...the wide gamut monitors use LED backlights which don't have this limitation.

Gee, none of my bridal and portrait clients every ask about that.....wonder why ?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Footski
MOD Footski
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow