Pre-Sharpened K5II studio comparison file compared to K5IIs file

Started Apr 22, 2013 | Discussions thread
Robgo2 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,010
Re: One of the things I mean to try is ...

philzucker wrote:

Robgo2 wrote:

Photo Ninja's sharpening is a deconvolution process, and I can attest that it is excellent, the best, in fact, that I have ever used.  There are other programs that offer deconvolution--ACR/LR, DxO, Photoshop (Smart Sharpen), Topaz In-Focus and others.  I do not know if Nik's Pre-sharpening is deconvolution as well.

Neither do I, Rob. But thanks for mentioning it. If I find a minute I'll try to replicate the results I got with Nik's RAW-Presharpener with LR's built in sharpening tools.

NIK's RAW-Presharpener in LR is a bit cumbersome to use - it's not only time consuming, but since you can't apply it to the raw file you have to be careful when to use it (e.g. only after lens corrections) - and of course you have the penalty of an extra 16 bit TIFF file cluttering up your hard drive ...

Well, bottom line is that I won't use pre-sharpening that often anyway, only on those occasions when I go for that big print and every pixel counts!



I have never been terribly impressed with LR/ACR's sharpening, but your experience may differ.  I believe that ACR has both deconvolution and USM.


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow