Why I HATE the term "capture" for taking a photo...

Started Apr 21, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
JulesJ
JulesJ Forum Pro • Posts: 41,560
Re: Why I HATE the term "capture" for taking a photo...

Paul Farace wrote:

I see an increasing number of "hipster" photo folks talking about what a neat CAPTURE an image is... as if you set a trap and a mouse tripped a wire and ended up in a cage. That is a total slam against a photographer... even the most casual picture taken has some level of input from the photographer... even if it's the choice of lens (wide vs. the perspective-compacting effect of a telephoto) or lighting choice (stobe vs. none), or camera position ...  Even if you try to be neutral in your effect of recording something, you can not help but effect the final outcome in some way. I would consider someone referring to my images as "captures" as in effect saying, you totally lucked out and accidentally caught those images...

Or capture might apply if you set up remote operated and self-triggered camera in the woods to record a hungry herd of deer, or a wild shot of a raccoon.

Maybe I am not looking at it the right way...   input?

-- hide signature --

Holding a camera, any camera, reduces my blood pressure, calms my nerves, and gives me a sense of opportunity!

I agree. What was wrong with good old take. I never use the word capture.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Biggs23 MOD
(unknown member)
Biggs23 MOD
Biggs23 MOD
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow