70-200mm f4 RRS collar is here

Started Apr 19, 2013 | Discussions thread
Michael Siemon Regular Member • Posts: 470
Re: 70-200mm f4 RRS collar is here

Denis of Whidbey Island wrote:


Knowing that the Kirk product is substantially less expensive, I can't really argue against it. I've no doubt it will do the job for anyone who does not mind its larger size and (presumably) weight.

The Kirk weighs 156 grams (5.5 ounces), or so says my kitchen scale... I don't know what the coating on the ring is (it is quite slippery/smooth). And to second your own remark, I am not really trying to argue against the RRS, but I am pleased with the Kirk.

-- hide signature --

Michael L. Siemon

 Michael Siemon's gear list:Michael Siemon's gear list
Sony RX100 IV Nikon 1 V2 Nikon D810 Nikon 1 J5 Nikon D500 +19 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow