The (in)significance of resolution

Started Apr 15, 2013 | Discussions thread
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee Veteran Member • Posts: 6,239
Re: The (in)significance of resolution

rattymouse wrote:

DMillier wrote:

Don't know, there could be any number of reasons that had nothing to do with the intrinsic resolution of the media.

No, it was the resolution difference.  Have you ever seen a medium format print?  It is completely different from a 35mm print.  Not even close to the same.

Not only have I seen both, but I used to print both, in BW and Colour. The most impressive thing about a MF colour print was the fantastic colour. It's still better than digital in that respect, I think.

But, when it comes to digital...

I photographed one wedding with two cameras, an Olympus E-3 (10-mp) and a Canon 1DS2 (16mp).

I printed a lot in A3.

I could not tell which was which unless I looked up the Jpegs..

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Panasonic FZ1000 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Canon EOS-1D X +27 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow