Equivalent focal length for MFT lenses

Started Apr 12, 2013 | Discussions thread
JeanPierre Martel Veteran Member • Posts: 3,029
Re: Equivalent focal length for MFT lenses

slimandy wrote:

JeanPierre Martel wrote:
A native 300mm m4/3 lens has exactly the same narrow angle of view as a 600mm lens on a full frame camera.

A F/6,7 lens is always a F/6,7 lens.

I think this is where people get confused about equivalents. You are right, the actual aperture does not change, BUT NEITHER DOES THE ACTUAL FOCAL LENGTH. What we are talking about when comparing to FF is the equivalent field of view and depth of field that results form the smaller sensor size. A 300mm f6.7 lens is always a 300mm f/6.7 lens, but the equivalent FF lens would be 600mm f/13.

Let me disagree. At the same ISO setting, the image shot by a 300mm m4/3 lens on a m4/3 camera will be exactly the same as the one taken by a 600mm FF lens on a FF camera when both apertures are set to F/6,7.

Of course, the diameter of the opening of the diaphragm at F/6,7 will be wider for the FF lens, compared to one on the m4/3 lens. So are their sensors. The end result is that the number of photons per square mm will be the same at F/6,7 and consequently, the image will be as dark or as pale on the FF as it is on a m4/3 camera.

However, it is true that if we put a m4/3 lens on a FF camera (using duck tape to hold it), a 300mm m4/3 lens at F/6.7 will draw a small image on the FF sensor and consequently, the average number of photons per square mm on the whole FF sensor will be lower and will then be equivalent to a 600mm FF lens at F/13.

But who on Earth would put a m4/3 lens on a FF camera?

 JeanPierre Martel's gear list:JeanPierre Martel's gear list
Olympus E-M5 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Leica Nocticron 42.5mm Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro +23 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow