Nikon FF v APS-C image comparison

Started Apr 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
paulkienitz Veteran Member • Posts: 5,273
Re: Nikon FF v APS-C image comparison

temama wrote:

paulkienitz wrote:

If I could have exactly what I wanted with cost being no object, I don't think I'd want either APS or FF.  For telephoto and casual work I'd get something like an Oly OM-D, and for landscapes and such, a 645D II.

I guess the lesson in that is that APS and FF are successful because they're good middle compromises.

Half-true. I just don't see how you can categorize OM-D (m43) over APS-C what comes to telephoto. I think APS-C DSLR is near perfect compromise for tele-shootings. Even m43 AF system is not good enough to such a shooting.

Actually, the ideal telephoto camera nowadays might be a Nikon 1.

-- hide signature --

Q with 02 zoom and Nikkor 180/2.8 ED for birding
K10D, Sig 17-70, DA 55-300, FA 50/1.4 "billy bass"
discards: DA 50-200 "zipper", F 100-300, Sigma 135-400 "piglet", M 400/5.6 "the Great Truncheon"

 paulkienitz's gear list:paulkienitz's gear list
Pentax Q Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA 55-300mm F4.0-5.8 ED Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM Samyang 8mm F3.5 Aspherical IF MC Fisheye +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow