Is FF sensors going to slowly phase out?

Started Apr 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
Bart Hickman Veteran Member • Posts: 7,256
Re: Nope, it's rather the opposite.

Erik Magnuson wrote:

They are a defensive move to protect market share from advances in small sensor cameras.  I suspect the profit margin on the bodies isn't that good.

This is odd logic: Nikon and Canon already make most of the APS-C sensor cameras anyway and are not trending down.  More likely they want to shift users into a price bracket where they have less competition and can thus command higher margins.

They aren't growing and meanwhile NEX and m43 were closing the gap with cameras like the D7000.  They haven't closed the gap yet obviously, but they will in a few years.

Also, why would a FF lens be less expensive to produce than a lens for a smaller sensor?

Many of the "less expensive" FF lenses are less expensive because they are older designs that already amortized initial costs.  New lenses tend to be more expensive unless designed to a specific price.

But old lenses generally aren't sharp enough for the new resolutions so something with tighter tolerances is required anyway.  Besides, APS-C lens volume probably outstrips FF lens volume, so APS-C lenses can also amortize these costs.

The salient advantage of FF is more dynamic range, and better low light performance for "reasonable" lens designs.  In terms of cost and weight, APS-C has the advantage especially when you go mirrorless (APS-C DSLRs are somewhat crippled by the fact that they have the same legacy flange distance as FF which makes wide angle lenses extra difficult to design.)


-- hide signature --
 Bart Hickman's gear list:Bart Hickman's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony a6000 Pentax smc FA 50mm F1.4 Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow