My poor EX2

I do not think you are going to widen anybody's mind with this sort of rambling incoherent rant.

Chris62 wrote:

The criticism was about some issues we will never see on your pictures showed here.The pictures are very nice indeed, but proove nothing about cameras comparison.Every camera can produce pictures - as predicted by producer.

There is not perfect camera so we always try to find own compromise beetwen advantages and disadvantages.

If EX2 is such good compromise for you OK nobody claims it is wrong.

I also use poor Samsung NX10 - poor in sense of technical properties comparison to other cameras from its level, but it does not mean unuseful to take nice pictures!

But even then I can not say that my  NX10 is better than Sony NEX6 or Samsung NX20 or Fuji XE1 etc.

In special conditions I will never get the same results.

The true is that is a poor camera for nowadays standards as my car and many other things in comparison to other because I do not have all the best goods in the world.

Look, my car works every day. I go work by car and I have no complain.

But if we speak about race then sorry, my car is not good tool to win the race.

I know her properties max speed, acceleration traction etc and I know that other car (i.e. Ferrar) is better for race.

But for every day driving, transport properties my car is better!

So do not be nervous that in other topic somebody critisized some issues.

The purpose of that was not to make you nervous but to widen the knowledge about camera properties. If you know where are weak points of our lens, you or somebody else can avoid use those settings and use the best if possible so then the results do not have to be poor as you proove by your pictures here.

Have a nice day.