Accurately comparing FF vs APS-C sensor performance? An open discussion.

Started Apr 8, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
jimrpdx
jimrpdx Veteran Member • Posts: 3,331
Re: Accurately comparing FF vs APS-C sensor performance? An open discussion.

VirtualMirage wrote:

Tom Wilson 62 wrote:

Where I'm coming from is that a FF image needs much less enlarging than an APS-C for e.g. an 8x10 and thus shows less noise (thus higher quality?) at a particular ISO setting.  Also, you're correct that depth of field is less but, unless you frequently need extensive DOF, it often doesn't matter.

I like your comments and they made me think but, as an old available light fanatic, I love my A99 (and thinner DOF on people pics) while still enjoying the reach with zooms on my A65.

Take care.  Tom

Hello Tom,

Out of the other posters so far, I think you have come the closest to understanding what I was initially writing about.  Thanks! 

I'll stop reading here and shout "Bingo!"  since I've read enough equivalency notes on the micro4/3 forum to make my brain hurt.  If you want to enlarge your images, start with the largest 'negative' and enjoy; if you post to social sites or blogs enjoy the size benefits of smaller-sensor cams... and also enjoy.  If making spreadsheets helps (and I have made many!), enjoy where it leads you.  In all cases: enjoy imaging!

-- hide signature --

Jim in Oregon -- Pentax user, Alpha & m4:3 veteran
talking to myself at http://granitix.blogspot.com

 jimrpdx's gear list:jimrpdx's gear list
Samsung NX300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Pentax K-3 II Samsung NX 50-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Pentax smc DA 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED WR +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KFZ
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow