Accurately comparing FF vs APS-C sensor performance? An open discussion.

Started Apr 8, 2013 | Discussions thread
OP VirtualMirage Veteran Member • Posts: 3,956
Re: you did it the hard way

tko wrote:

There's a proven theorem that's been around for a while. By "proven" I mean mathematically derived from lens and sensor properties. It states that for equal DOF, all sensor sizes offer about the same performance, assuming equal sensor and lens technology. Yes, this applies to diffraction as well.

Yep.  My point here was to bring this up where I feel it is often overlooked.  Nothing more.

So, the major advantage of FF occurs with reduced DOF. You're trading DOF for low light performance. But remember you can always stop FF down, but you can't open smaller systems past the capabilities of their lenses.

That is true too, which I mentioned as well.

Put another way: given enough light, the same DOF, and assuming a high enough quality lens and sensor, a cell phone and a medium format camera will have about the same image.

Yes, in the real world this might not be true. Possible the cell phone has the most recent, state of the art sensor. Perhaps the larger sensor has a greater dynamic range due to larger sensor sites. There are a ton of practical differences between a tiny and large sensor.

Also true, which can warrant advantages to both.  The one that fits the greatest needs of the photographer is going to be the better tool to use.

-- hide signature --


 VirtualMirage's gear list:VirtualMirage's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony a77 II Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD +18 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow