Just how crappy is the 16-50 kit lens? Test vs 17mm prime & 11-16 Tokina

Started Mar 31, 2013 | Discussions thread
Ari Aikomus
Ari Aikomus Veteran Member • Posts: 9,339
Second attempt: -> A lot of full size E16-50PZ samples!!
2

Hi,

I'm sorry, but apparently I did something wrong, because all the pictures were not showing correctly.

In this message the images are put to display properly!

Ari Aikomus wrote:

franzel wrote:

I don't doubt for a moment that downsized and seriously oversharpened images are the forte of the 1650 .

O-okey. You want full size E16-50 samples without any extra treatment?

Your wish is my command.

...But before that you might want to explore this my modest comparison:

E16-50 vs. E16 vs...

Here we comes... 
   Next I will show you full size snapshots with NEX-6+E16-50 lens, in-camera jpgs only, no extra PP.

EDIT: Dpreview forum has a problem send messages correctly, I hope that the images are displayed correctly! Sorry.

1. 16mm, f/3.5:

2. 16mm, f/9:

3. 16mm, f/4:

4. 16mm, f/4:

5. 16mm, f/4 - FLARE TEST:

6. 16mm, f/3.5:

7. 16mm, f/8:

NEXT: 18-50 focal lengths..

Ari

-- hide signature --

http://koti.mbnet.fi/tidis/AAikomus.jpg
- Ari Aikomus -
'Why should I feel lonely ? is not our planet in the Milky way?'

-- hide signature --

http://koti.mbnet.fi/tidis/AAikomus.jpg
- Ari Aikomus -
'Why should I feel lonely ? is not our planet in the Milky way?'

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
wll
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow