Aperature or Lightroom?

Started Mar 22, 2013 | Questions thread
DiploStrat Contributing Member • Posts: 787
Re: Patience, Grasshopper.

The short answer is "yes," you only see one image on screen; all the rest is automagic. The longer answer is "yes," as far as I know, Aperture actually invented this workflow.

The advantages to a non destructive workflow are:

  • It is non destructive. Whatever you do, you can always retrieve the master image.
  • You can create as many versions of an image as you want (e.g. B&W, different crops, color, etc.) and you do not have to duplicate the master. As masters grow from 10 MB to over 50 MB, each version is still only about 100 KB. (Previews do take up space, but you can control that as required.
  • You never have to worry about file formats and conversions. The master remains RAW (or JPEG or whatever) and you always work with that. JPEGS for posting on the web or mailing to Aunt Mary are "exports" which you create on the fly and delete.


 DiploStrat's gear list:DiploStrat's gear list
Nikon D60 Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow