Missing the 70-200 f2.8 (warning, long post)

Started Apr 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
saintz Contributing Member • Posts: 551
Re: Missing the 70-200 f2.8 (warning, long post)

I would go with option 2, a AF adapter and A mount lens.

Really depends what you shoot. Do you just need reach, or also AF?

I have a 85 f1.4 and 200 f2.8 manual lenses. The lack of AF would make sports more difficult to shoot, but probably not impossible. For pure reach, they work pretty well. You can also find manual 80-200 f2.8 lenses pretty easily.

 saintz's gear list:saintz's gear list
Sony a6000 Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow