A few words on Equivalence and comparing systems

Started Apr 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Bob Tullis
Bob Tullis Forum Pro • Posts: 33,116
Re: A few words on Equivalence and comparing systems

Macx wrote:

I understand the point of thinking about lenses in focal lengths and focal ratios, but for the purpose of comparing lenses for one system with lenses for another system, it would be much better to talk about what angle of view (or field of view) the lens is providing and the physical size of the aperture. It really cuts through to what is important with regards to framing, perspective, depth of field, diffraction and light, and the argument that "Angle of view = angle of view" and "Physical size of the aperture = physical size of the aperture" are easy to grasp.

Two systems using lenses that each provide the same angle of view and with the same physical size of the aperture are equivalent.

And I think that as we're finally moving towards a new paradigm of what the goal of exposure is in digital photography, the old idea about "f/2.8 is f/2.8" might also be slowly on the way out.

You mean, as in "EC +/- 1/3 and be there"?

-- hide signature --

...Bob, NYC
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man

 Bob Tullis's gear list:Bob Tullis's gear list
Sony RX1R II Sony Alpha 7R II Fujifilm X-T2 Zeiss Batis 25mm F2 Zeiss Batis 85mm F1.8 +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow