Is Full frame still the most versatile?

Started Mar 31, 2013 | Discussions thread
peevee1 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,247
Re: mFT has eveything FF has except .... Re: Is Full frame still the most versatile?

plevyadophy wrote:

mFT with the coming to market of the OM-D and GH3 is on par with the likes of the 5D Mark III, what ever difference there is exists only on paper as far as I am concerned. In practical use, you cannot tell the difference except, as I said earlier, for one difference and that is tracking focus across the frame where a ff DSLR will win hands down.

Not even every FF DSLR, I doubt very much that the pathetic 9-point AF system in Canon 6D can keep up, and the AF system in D600, although good for APS-C, simply covers too little of a frame for FF, so as soon as your subject wanders outside of it (which is too easy), it is lost. And these are the latest FF DSLRs, what would you say about 5D II or Sony A900? Not every FF DSLR is 1D X.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MOD Biggs23
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Biggs23
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow