Why the x100s files are lacking

Started Mar 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
sgoldswo Veteran Member • Posts: 5,708
Re: Why the x100s files are awesome

samhain wrote:

I just wanted to be clear- I didn't post this to slam the x100s (or x-trans sensors). In fact I'll be buying one.
Like Zac Arias said- I don't care that the images are 'flat' or 'lacking'. It makes them easier to work with in PP.

I just see a lot of folks saying the files are: different, lacking, not as good as x100, more digital looking, etc.
I thought this user's post was an interesting take on the subject. It shouldn't persuade anyone not to buy an x100s. It's just some input as to why the files are different, or lacking as some say.

I just don't get this idea that X100S files are "more" digital looking than those from the X100. As a bayer sensor camera, the X100 looks the more digital to me (very similar to those from the E-P3 to be frank).

 sgoldswo's gear list:sgoldswo's gear list
Leica Q Leica M Typ 240 Nikon Df Nikon D810 Nikon D750 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow