Why the x100s files are lacking

Started Mar 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
sgoldswo Veteran Member • Posts: 5,717
Re: ?

samhain wrote:

samhain wrote:

Not at all.

Lol I should've known that was coming.

Well, I thought someone sharing test data that provides fuji's true iso's (which vary greatly from fuji's stated iso's), how it effects the files, providing explanations as to exactly why the photos have a certain 'look' that everyone keeps talking about, reasons why Lightroom & other processing programs have had such a hard time with the x-trans sensor files and then giving an opinion on the cameras' files and how they differ from each other having owned the x100, x-pro1 & xe-1- all in one post- well i thought it was pretty informative.
I take it you already knew all that stuff?
I haven't seen any of that info anywhere, just lots of questions & speculations.

I guess we all have different opinions as to what 'information' is. I found it pretty interesting so I thought I'd share it.

Funny, doesn't the X100 rely upon curve lifting as well to get to higher ISOs? It would have to give its the same sensor that was in my old A700

 sgoldswo's gear list:sgoldswo's gear list
Leica Q Leica M Typ 240 Nikon Df Nikon D810 Nikon D750 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow