Decent manual focus landscape lens?

Started Mar 28, 2013 | Questions thread
EinsteinsGhost Forum Pro • Posts: 11,977
Re: Decent manual focus landscape lens?

JAGmtb wrote:

Tom2572 wrote:

Mel Snyder wrote:

I agree - complaints about the 16-50mm are WAY overblown by people who shoot test charts. Stopped down one or 2 stops, at 16mm, it's enough to make me question the weight of carrying my 11-16mm Tokina, except for cathedral/mosque interiors

One thought - when you shoot "landscapes" what precisely do you expect, and where will you be shooting? If desert and basically nothing for miles but flatness, a wide angle isn't very useful - to get the bang out of it,  I think you need a distinct near, middle and distant object to get the depth that makes "WOW!"

Most of my landscape shots would be at the top of a ride. When I lay my head down at night and dream of my ideal shot, it's riding 10,000 feet on a crest and the picture takes in enough scenery for the viewer to understand and appreciate the scope of the ride. Something like this  or this

He did say under $200 guys. How much is the C/Y 28mm going for these days?

I looked up the 16-50mm, and if I'm looking at the right one , it's a little pricey.

That is the A-mount lens, pricey also because it is an f/2.8 (constant aperture) lens. I think Mel was alluding to 16-50 OSS (kit zoom on new NEX cameras).

 EinsteinsGhost's gear list:EinsteinsGhost's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F828 Sony SLT-A55 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Sony 135mm F2.8 (T4.5) STF +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow