Amanda Knox - Double Jeopardy

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
William Carson
William Carson Veteran Member • Posts: 5,710
Re: Amanda Knox - Double Jeopardy

The reason I don't think there is a conclusive case against the two is that the things that you are saying are conclusive are, as you said,  circumstantial. A late night phone call to me means nothing. A lamp that was in a locked room that was belonging to Knox, again means nothing. You did not read the whole detailed article I sited and just lable it as 'American magazine.' Of all the things put out by media, this (article) was what cleared up the non-substanciated case against the two.

"Large traces of Knox's blood was mixed with Kerchers' blood in the bathroom"

Now, this would be conclusive if true. But was there large amounts of Knox's blood mixed with Kerchers'?  How much?

That she falsely accused another person after hours of interrogation is what happens to a confused frightened person and at best is a weakness of character. Of course it could also be part of the crime but it is not conclusive at all.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow