Finally...Tamron beats Nikon

Started Mar 24, 2013 | Discussions thread
Leonard Migliore
Leonard Migliore Forum Pro • Posts: 14,353
Fully in agreement

Stacey_K wrote:

Leonard Migliore wrote:

Shotcents wrote:

Wide open at 300mm the Tamron is tack sharp. Bokeh is quite reasonable and the lens AF is quick enough. Be sure to VIEW ORIGINAL to see the better quality view.

I've been able to get tolerable results out of the Tamron


I got tired of fighting the image quality at 300 and got a 300 f/4 Nikkor. The Nikkor prime is way better.

-- hide signature --

Leonard Migliore

Of course a $1500 prime is better The 180mm f2.8D prime is better than any of the zooms at that focus length as well. Same with the 85mm f1.8.

Fer sure. I was just indicating that I, for one, didn't find the Tamron's bokeh "reasonable" or its sharpness tacklike; I found it poor enough to part with $1500 to get something decent. And it's relatively hard to get me to part with $1500.

-- hide signature --

Leonard Migliore

 Leonard Migliore's gear list:Leonard Migliore's gear list
Canon PowerShot G12 Sony RX100 III Nikon D300 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow