I think Thom was right, again...

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee Veteran Member • Posts: 6,105
While digital PER SHOT is cheaper...

Film per good shot is much cheaper.

I had a high hit rate of good shots with film, much much higher than I have with digital as I took more care.

In a wedding I might take 120 shots with medium format. I would be disappointed if more than 5 were poor..

That's the way it was.

You kept the same camera year in year out. Money was spent on film, development etc.

You could save a lot on digital if you kept the latest cameras which are as good as you will every really NEED.

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Panasonic FZ1000 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Canon EOS-1D X +25 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow