Has the X20 met or failed your expectations?

Started Mar 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
horsth Senior Member • Posts: 1,335
Re: Has the X20 met or failed your expectations?

..... it delivers some off Fujified definition of where it thinks or hopes you intended to focus...

sorry, but in my opinion this is wrong. Instead the focus indication shows where in fact you have focused, allowing for the paralax-error. This is absolutely perfect and gives you the possibility to correct after the half press for the paralax failure that is inherent in any OVF-system. Absolutely super. This is for instance very easily accomplished, if you set in the learning phase the focus point allways to the middle position of the matrix.

I had the X10 and have now the X20. The X20 plays in a different (higher) league. 12MP IQ is now superb from raw. For OOC-JPGs one must find just the prefered settings. The viewfinder is now really usable (see above comments), the lens correction in the wide position is good now. No compression any more. There are a lot of further inprovements which make functionality and the handling better.

 horsth's gear list:horsth's gear list
Fujifilm X20 Olympus E-M1 II Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow