55-300 VR vs 70-300 VR

Started Apr 11, 2012 | Discussions thread
Chrasmus
Chrasmus Regular Member • Posts: 209
Borderline Garbage!?

My 55-300 has been a fine lens, and I would disagree with the statement that it is borderline garbage.  Even though I wish that I would have purchased the 70-300 in lieu of the 55-300 due to its better AF, and since it is an FX lens, I believe that one can get great shots with the 55-300.  Considering the cost, it is a great value.

If I make up my mind to stick with Nikon, I would love to purchase the 300 mm/4.0, which should make it easier than either one of the zooms to get good shots.

Here are a few shots taken with my 55-300:

Regards,

Christian

 Chrasmus's gear list:Chrasmus's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Nikon D7200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Micro-Nikkor 85mm f/3.5G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow