What I learned from Gollywop -- and what I wonder

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
texinwien Veteran Member • Posts: 3,326
Re: What I learned from Gollywop -- and what I wonder

LincolnB wrote:

bowportes wrote:

Something that's not as clear to me though. If ISO is at base (160 for most Pannys and 200 for Olympus), the lens is at maximum aperture, and shutter-speed can't be set slower, but the histogram still sits right in the middle -- not overexposed at all -- if I understand correctly, I might get some improvement in image quality by raising the ISO to 400 or 800 in order to overexpose the image, as long as I'm careful not to overexpose to the point where I'm clipping highlights. I'd like confirmation that this is correct.

You might get less highlight clipping and less shadow noise but you'll get more sensor noise overall. There is a trade-off.

I believe that is incorrect. Assuming exposure stays the same (same luminance, aperture and shutter speed), going from a lower ISO with higher read noise to a higher ISO with lower read noise (say, from ISO 200 to ISO 400 on the E-M5) will net you less noise.

It will, however, also net you less dynamic range, tonal range and color sensitivity. That's where the tradeoff comes into play with this strategy. You have to decide whether the drop in read noise is worth the tradeoff in the loss of dynamic range, tonal range and color sensitivity that comes along with it (when bumping ISO from 200 to 400 on the E-M5 and keeping exposure the same, as an example).


 texinwien's gear list:texinwien's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 OnePlus One Canon EOS 300D +20 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow