300mm Telephoto Lens and Boudoire Photography, am I missing something? Locked

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
Barrie Davis
Barrie Davis Forum Pro • Posts: 21,460
Re: 300mm Telephoto Lens and Boudoire Photography, am I missing something?

En Trance wrote:

Micketto wrote:

En Trance wrote:

scorrpio wrote:

'300mm' is not 'gigantic zoom'. (it's a moderately gigantic prime) You might wish to determine precisely the model of the lens being used before going any further.

If the lens in question is an EF 28-300 f/3.5-5.6L IS USM, it's a full-frame equivalent of the 18-200, and is pretty huge.

If you know, why would you choose a 300 or a 200 for that matter over a wide angle?

It's funny that while you insult everyone in this thread, you are the only one that doesn't know why longer focal lengths re more idea for portraits than perspective distorting wide angles. A few people have already answered this question, but I hope no one else does because watching you get defensive and ignore the answers is more entertaining.

Good Wide Angle Lense. Try that one out, K pumpkin?

For your information, the word "lens" has only one 'e.'

Oh, and while I am being helpful, "boudoir" doesn't have even that many.

-- hide signature --

"Ahh... But the thing is, these guys were no ORDINARY time travellers!"

 Barrie Davis's gear list:Barrie Davis's gear list
Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow