Food for thought - FF vs M4/3's cost

Started Mar 25, 2013 | Discussions thread
Dr_Jon Veteran Member • Posts: 4,790
Re: Food for thought - FF vs M4/3's cost

Shooting a brick wall recently (see my reply to the OP below, BTW I only bother if I see something I don't like in a lens when using it) I was very (!! even extremely) surprised by the additional sharpness I got with a £149 Canon prime wide-open on a FF camera (5DmkII) over a £999 zoom on a GH3. It's partly the lower noise but a lot of it is just outright extra resolution.

Photozone convinced me I didn't have a dud 12-35 as they have the 40/2.8 wide-open in the extreme corners as 2950 lw/ph vs the 12-35 just about gets that in the centre at f4 (where the Canon is 3724). Plus the Canon corners are further away from the centre than the m43 ones. The Panny 25/1.4 just about hits 2300 in the corners at f5.6. (Only limited comparisons are available as I'm sticking to m43 lenses they've tested at 16MP, but the 25/1.4 seems well thought of, I prefer the 20/1.7 personally.)

 Dr_Jon's gear list:Dr_Jon's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Sony RX100 V Canon EOS 5DS R Panasonic GH5 Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM +26 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow