I think Thom was right, again...

Started Mar 26, 2013 | Discussions thread
stany buyle Senior Member • Posts: 1,957
---Might--- not actually be cheaper...


Some time ago Thom Hogan posted that digital might not actually be cheaper than film,

"Might" is the key word here.

  • If I would take only the same number of pictures as I did with film, digital is MUCH cheaper.
  • If I would have stayed with my D100 or D200 which was comparable with asa sensivities and IQ in low light, digital would be MUCH cheaper. I still have my D1H and my D200 and they both operate perfect.

But, while I want to be able to shoot at iso 3200 and get silk clean images and even at 25600, -which was impossible in film days with amateur gear-, digital might be more expensive.

So Thom wrote "might", which everybody knew.

-- hide signature --

Kindest regards.
Stany Buyle
I like better one good picture in a day than 10 bad ones in a second..

 stany buyle's gear list:stany buyle's gear list
Nikon D1
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow