DigitalRev take down GoPro review, copyright
The offending site probably used a GoPro graphic or web content without autorization. Copyright law would not prohibit DigitalRev from showing pictures or video it shot with the camera, nor from publishing a review.
In truth, many sites don't review products at all, but merely re-present the spec sheets issued by the manufacturers and add a few unoriginal or flagrantly borrowed comments.
It would be curious to see if any serious side-by-side reviews of POV cameras exist at all. Such tests would be difficult to concoct, since they could involve stunts that either costly or dangerous. If you get a daredevil to BASE jump with one camera, who perishes or turns chicken, you might have to recruit another to perform the same jump with a competing camera. Viewers will complain that the test was unfair because both test should involve the same location, risk of mortality, and G-force at impact on the rocks or reef.
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Mar 25, 2013||1|
|Mar 25, 2013|
|Mar 26, 2013||1|
|Mar 30, 2013|
|Apr 28, 2013|
|Mar 31, 2013||1|
|Apr 12, 2013|
|Apr 28, 2013||1|
|Mig-17-1 by bbmach|
from Low Pass
|Rotting Gracefully by Mond|
from Natural Decay
|attic by wgjohnston|
from In the attic, or in the basement!
|Ox Bow Aspen by McFrost|
from cell phones - nature photographs