Sorted at last?

Started Mar 24, 2013 | Discussions thread
OP mu55 Senior Member • Posts: 1,397
Re: Sorted at last?

I do think a 17mm shift lens is on the distant horizon, i decided the 70-200 f2.8L was too heavy and i don't tend to shoot tele very much, which is why the 100-300L hasn't seen an upgrade, the 135L serves quite well and sits right in the middle of 70-200, but i do see the need for zoom capability often - I think the F4 IS version would cut it for me

100-300L is actually pretty good, better than the 70-300 IS i used to own (and shouldn't have sold), unfortunately f5.6 through the whole range and 300mm needs at least f8 - but your right, probably wouldn't cut it now days - it is better than my 24-105 at 100mm even wide open, painful to focus slow....

not a fan of fisheyes, although could be cool to use underwater to shoot fishes eyes

Underwater housing... now that would be cool.

 mu55's gear list:mu55's gear list
Ricoh GR Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 5D Mark IV +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow